Captchas: Difference between revisions

From ASRG
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(Added note that spammers can simply pay people to solve CAPTCHAs.)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
* All of the general problems with [[Challenges]]
* All of the general problems with [[Challenges]]
* Not user friendly with people with physical deficiencies - blind people may not be able to correctly decode captchas (see [http://www.acb.org/board-minutes/bm070802.html American Council of the Blind]
* Not user friendly with people with physical deficiencies - blind people may not be able to correctly decode captchas (see [http://www.acb.org/board-minutes/bm070802.html American Council of the Blind]
* Often not user-friendly to people with normal vision either; CAPTCHA system misbehavior is a common source of humor on the Internet.
* Spammers can simply pay humans in poorer nations to solve CAPTCHAs. In 2010, [http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/08/price-captcha commercial CAPTCHA-solving services were seen] charging $1 per thousand CAPTCHAs solved. At those rates, a fairly large spamming campaign can still be cost-effective.


== References ==
== References ==
Line 20: Line 22:
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha Wikipedia]
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captcha Wikipedia]
* [http://www.acb.org/board-minutes/bm070802.html American Council of the Blind]
* [http://www.acb.org/board-minutes/bm070802.html American Council of the Blind]
* [http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ www.w3.org] Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA
* [http://www.w3.org/TR/turingtest/ W3C Inaccessibility of CAPTCHA]
* [http://www2.parc.com/istl/projects/captcha/history.htm PARC history of Captchas]

Latest revision as of 10:56, 30 September 2010

Anti-spam technique: Captchas
Date of first use: ca. 2001
Effectiveness: Medium
Popularity: Medium
Difficulty of implementation: Medium
Where implemented: MTA or MUA
Harm: High

Captchas (from "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart") is version of mail challenges, adapted from a method originally designed to protect web forms from being completed by robots.

When using to protect a mailbox, a confirmation message is sent to the sender when he writes to the protected mailbox for the first time, indicating a web page where he will be asked to enter a textual code hidden in an image. If the correct answer is given, the sender is added to a whitelist so subsequent messages will be accepted without any further action.

Although some defenders of this method claim it provides "100 % spam stopped without loss of messages", in practice this method has many drawbacks including:

  • All of the general problems with Challenges
  • Not user friendly with people with physical deficiencies - blind people may not be able to correctly decode captchas (see American Council of the Blind
  • Often not user-friendly to people with normal vision either; CAPTCHA system misbehavior is a common source of humor on the Internet.
  • Spammers can simply pay humans in poorer nations to solve CAPTCHAs. In 2010, commercial CAPTCHA-solving services were seen charging $1 per thousand CAPTCHAs solved. At those rates, a fairly large spamming campaign can still be cost-effective.

References